A Categorical Catastrophe

unforth:

mihrsuri:

headcanonsandmore:

Christopher Eccleston would be so good as Sam Vimes it’s not even funny.

Consider also: he plays opposite Siddig El Fadil as Vetinari

I’m not even in Discworld fandom but I need this like air omfg.

(via thebibliosphere)

fashion-runways:

CHOTRONETTE ‘Goth Armour’ Dress
if you want to support this blog consider donating to: ko-fi.com/fashionrunways

frommybookbook:

trek-tracks:

Realizing that Amok Time, from T'Pring’s perspective, is basically the equivalent of a Vulcan Hallmark Movie, where a holiday (Pon Farr) makes our hero realize she wants hometown boy Stonn and a simple (Vulcan) life instead of big-city (space) boyfriend Spock, and it all comes to a head in an embarrassing misunderstanding in front of her family, is certainly making me feel some kind of way

I will never watch this episode the same again.

(via jabberwockypie)

hellenhighwater:

hellenhighwater:

froggybangbang:

hellenhighwater:

karlyanalora:

hellenhighwater:

i think i downloaded some kind of computer virus

Oh dear. Are you just getting annoying popup ads, or is it worse than that?

Much worse.

Gremlin.exe is super hard to uninstall i hear. Good luck!

It’s spreading, evolving–

Modern problems require ancient solutions.

I have given the viruses a stick.

(via thebibliosphere)

alex51324:

politijohn:

Source

Interesting to call this “confiscating” when it’s just making the rich pay their fair share, especially considering all the stolen wealth from the bottom 99% and historic tax evasion.

Besides the obvious, the hidden benefit of this is that it provides an endpoint to runaway growth.

The biggest problem with capitalism, the reason it’s so destructive to the planet and to the workers and even, ultimately, to the capitalists, is that, after a certain point, the money’s just a way of keeping score. The number at the bottom of the column has no bearing on what you can buy or do; as a result, there’s no such thing as enough. The number can always be bigger.

Under this proposal, once you hit $1 billion, you’ve won capitalism. You beat the game, achieved the maximum score; you’re finished. There’s nothing more you can accumulate. You now have to find a purpose in life other that the relentless pursuit of profit. (And if we’re really lucky, it might be something that actually benefits other people, but even if not, it’s unlikely to be as damaging as whatever it is you were doing to get that $1 billion.)

Instead of companies expanding endlessly, like tumors, there’s a point where, when all the major stakeholders are maxing out on profit, it makes sense to just hold steady. Keep doing/making/selling whatever it is you do/sell/make, but stop trying to do/sell/make more of it every year.

The problem with a tumor–what makes it cancer–is that it keeps growing and growing, until eventually it’s taking up so much space and consuming so many resources that the surrounding tissues can’t function. The tumor doesn’t have to do anything better than the other tissues in order to crowd them out; it just does it faster. Stop the uncontrolled growth, and it’s something you can live with.

Stopping the uncontrolled growth of capital means more opportunities for multiple businesses–big and small–operating in the same sector, since it doesn’t make sense for any one company to gobble up too much of the market share. That, in turn, means more choices for customers–and workers, since they can take their skills to another employer doing similar things. It means less waste, as there’s no longer an economic upside to spewing cheap goods out of a fire-hose before you even know whether anyone wants to buy them. That could mean slower, more thoughtful use of resources in the first place, but at minimum, it’s going to mean not manufacturing products only to immediately throw them away.

(via systlin)

ohhgingersnaps:

I’m seeing some frustration over fandom creatives expressing anger or distress over people feeding their work into ChatGPT. I’m not responding to OP directly because I don’t want to derail their post (their intent was to provide perspective on how these models actually work, and reduce undue panic, which is all coming from a good place!), but reassurances that the addition of our work will have a negligible impact on the model (which is true at this point) does kind of miss the point? Speaking for myself, my distress is less about the practical ramifications of feeding my fic into ChatGPT, and more about the principle of someone taking my work and deliberately adding it to the dataset.

Like, I fully realize that my work is a drop in the bucket of ChatGPT’s several-billion-token training set! It will not make a demonstrable practical difference in the output of the model! That doesn’t change the fact that I do not want my work to be part of the set of data that the ChatGPT devs use for training.

According to their FAQ, ChatGPT can and will use user input to train itself. The terms and conditions explicitly state that they save your chats to help train and improve their models. (You can opt-out, but sharing is the default.) So if you’re feeding a fic into ChatGPT, unless you’ve explicitly opted out, you are handing it to the ChatGPT team and giving them permission to use it for training, whether or not that was your intent.

Now, will one fic make a demonstrable difference in the output of the model? No! But as the person who spent a year and a handful of months laboring over my fic, it makes a difference to me whether my fic, specifically, is being used in the dataset. If authors are allowed to have a problem with the ChatGPT devs for scraping millions of fics without permission, they’re also allowed to have a problem with folks handing their individual fics over via the chat interface.

I do want to add that if you’ve done this to a fic, please don’t take this as me being upset with you personally! Folks are still learning new information and puzzling out what “good” vs. “bad” use is, from an ethical standpoint. (Heck, my own perspective on this is deeply based on my own subjective feelings!) And we certainly shouldn’t act like one person feeding a fic into ChatGPT has the same practical negative impact, on a broad societal scale, as a team using a web crawler to scrape five billion pieces of artwork for Stable Diffusion.

The point is that fundamentally, an ethical dataset should be obtained with the consent of those providing the data. Just because it’s normalized for our data to be scraped without consent doesn’t make it ethical, and this is why ChatGPT gives users the option to not share data— there is actually a standardized way (robots.txt) for website servers to set policies for how bots/crawlers can interact with them, for exactly this reason— and I think fandom artists and authors are well within their rights to express a desire for opting out to be the socially-respected default within the fandom community.

(via marvelingjules)

chuutoro:

since it’s pride month, throwback to this beautiful cover and this wholesome interaction between two icons

(via marvelingjules)

thebibliosphere:

crimeronan:

i’ve seen a couple people in the notes of this very good post about fictional polyamory by @thebibliosphere say things along the lines of “oh, i’ve been doing it wrong :(” or “how do i know if i did this right??” or “i should probably give up and start over, i wrote this badly :(” and. no!!!!

(i AM seeing far MORE people say “oh, this clarified and helped me so much, i think i know how to fix issues i’ve been having with my own story” which. YES!!!!)

listen. if you’re a monogamous person who’s writing a polyamorous relationship, and you’ve been focusing mainly on The Triad and All Three Together All The Time as the endgame, that’s literally fine. that’s a perfectly acceptable and strong starting point for your plotting, imo. you do not need to give up on a story that you’ve started like this.

but the things discussed in the post Can and Should improve your execution!

you can keep the same plot beats and overall relationship arc 100%. polyamorous relationships are infinite in their formations, every one is unique. “basically a monogamous romance but with three people” Does exist, as a relationship type. you’re not hashtag Misrepresenting ™ poly people with it

BUT i do think it will help to read up on some poly people talking about how their relationships Differ from monogamous ones.

so i have outlined some basic important concepts about polyamory.

MORE IMPORTANTLY though, i’ve broken down some questions that you can answer throughout the writing process to strengthen your individual dyad relationships, your individual characterization, & your characters’ individual feelings/experiences. this is a writing resource have fun

future kitkat butting in to say i spent over two hours writing this and it definitely needs a readmore. it is also NOT comprehensive. but everything should be pretty simple to follow! feel free to reblog if you find it helpful yourself or just want to reward me for how gotdan long this took KSLDKFJKDL.

i’ve grabbed quick links for a couple of the important concepts, some have SEO pitches in them but the info largely seems to be good. (if i missed anything Egregiously Gross on these sites i should be able to update the links with better ones later, since they’re under the readmore.)

sidenote: this is NOT meant to be overwhelming, despite the length. if you can’t read all of this, that’s Okay. you do not need to give up on your writing.

here we go:

Keep reading

Thank you for taking the time to do this!!

I will say one thing: if you are looking for advice, don’t go to the r/polyamory subreddit. They tend to be unnecessarily mean about non-polyam people writing about polyamory. Hell, they’re mean about polyamorous people writing polyamory too if it’s not the kind of polyamory they want to see 😅

But yes, please ask!! We’re happy to help increase the diversity of polyamorous representation!

bees-with-swords:

“Do you ever dream of land?” The whale asks the tuna.

“No.” Says the tuna, “Do you?”

“I have never seen it.” Says the whale, “but deep in my body, I remember it.”

“Why do you care,” says the tuna, “if you will never see it.”

“There are bones in my body built to walk through the forests and the mountains.” Says the whale.

“They will disappear.” Says the tuna, “one day, your body will forget the forests and the mountains.”

“Maybe I don’t want to forget,” Says the whale, “The forests were once my home.”

“I have seen the forests.” Whispers the salmon, almost to itself.

“Tell me what you have seen,” says the whale.

“The forests spawned me.” Says the salmon. “They sent me to the ocean to grow. When I am fat with the bounty of the ocean, I will bring it home.”

“Why would the forests seek the bounty of the oceans?” Asks the whale. “They have bounty of their own.”

“You forget,” says the salmon, “That the oceans were once their home.”

(via ooksaidthelibrarian)

theylor:

urbanfantasyinspiration:

theinformationcollector:

TIL In 1926 the famous pianist Fats Waller (then 21) was kidnapped by Al Capone’s gang to play piano for his birthday. He basically went missing for 3 days and was returned unharmed but drunk.

via reddit.com

What this headline leaves out is that they kidnapped him by doing the standard mob thing of driving a car up, pointing a gun at him, and saying “get in”. Fats thought he was gonna be killed until Al told him he was a huge fan

(via victoriousscarf)

bumblebeerror:

Please take a comforting, realistic affirmation and pass it on :]

This too shall pass.

Know that you can’t save everyone. Remember that you can try.

It has been okay before. Someday, it will be okay again.

You are special in that you are the only you, not the only one feeling this.

You don’t have to love yourself now. First, you have to not hate yourself.

You are doing what you can. It is enough.

See Results

(via marvelingjules)